as you're discussing this whole desi/central-asian thing at the moment: i wouldn't really call nepal desi. if you look at the cultural heritages of nepal, the vast majority of them was made by non-desi folks of nepal. temples in and around the Ktm valley were made by the Newars, stupas and bihars also don't have a "desi origin". the only thing that makes nepal look desi is the high percentage of hindus. but have you read about the forced sanskritization by the gurkha kings and ranas?
(part 2) Previous hindu rulers of Nepal forced people to leave their buddhist/animist/kirati traditions behind. They even prosecuted those who didn’t sanskritize themselves. The Ranas also persecuted buddhist monks and oppressed buddhist movements. In the 20th century, statistics were faked by making the number of hindus larger than it actually is and by counting people who practise two religions as hindus
The Ranas screwed over a lot of people to put it blankly. They were tyrants who pretty much had no care for the common people or anyone who wasn’t like them to be honest. I am aware of the forced sanskitization and a lot of other Nepali tribes and ethnicities faced extinction or near-extinction. But being said, there are still a lot of “desi” influence and aspects in Nepal. Hindus make up a very large part of the Nepali population regardless and they have “desi” heritage or many of them would identify as part-desi. I don’t think it’s fair to erase their cultural identity. There are many people, especially in the Terai region of Nepal who are Nepalis of Indian heritage, and there are also Marwari (sp?) Nepalis who are similar (they are part of the Marwari ethnic group from Rajasthan area).
So, I am going to stick by my original statement, Nepal has both “Desi” and Central Asian influences but has emerged with a unique culture of its own, and some Nepalis would identify as Desi while others would not. It’s a mix of both and I don’t think it’s fair to erase anyone’s cultural identity by omitting one or the other.

